Department of Languages, Faculty of Applied Arts
King Mongkut’s
Program in Translation for Education and Business
815406 Research and Report Writing
Semester: 1/2009
Class schedule: Wednesday, 6-9 p.m.
Instructor: Karnchanoke Wattanasin, Ph.D.
Technical Education Bldg., Room 703
Office Hours: By appointment
Course Description
This course focuses primarily on the development of students’ skills in writing in English. Students will be exposed to a myriad of writing practices, ranging from expressive to academic writing, as well as reading texts of their interests and those pertaining to translation research (TR). Major course activities include reading, class discussion, writing essays, peer review of students’ writing, and conferencing with the instructor.
Objectives
In this course, students will:
- Learn and practice writing skills that will help them to write;
- Read texts, and write to express their thoughts and to comment on the texts they have read; and
- Write multiple drafts of essays and reports based on their reading and class discussions, and an essay summarizing and critiquing a translation research.
Evaluation
The assessment of this course is principally based on students’ on-line evaluation-free journals at http://815406.blogspot.com/, essay writing and submission, and class participation. Students will write at least 6 class essays for the entire semester, and are allowed to choose their own topics, with two required essays: one transactional-academic (TA) essays, and one expressive-transactional (ET) essay. Overall, class essays include:
- Weekly on-line journal entries, at least one double-spaced A4 page in length. All journal entries must be submitted 3 days prior to each class.
- Expressive-transactional (ET) essays: 1-2 double-spaced pages per essay.
- Transactional-academic (TA) essays: 2-3 double-spaced pages per essay. For Essay 5, students are required to read and discuss one translation research (TR) paper of their choice and write a summary and critique of the research. The essay must be accompanied by an abstract of the research being discussed.
- One reflection (ET) essay submitted with the portfolio: 1-2 double-spaced pages. This essay is a reflection on the author’s experience with writing in this class, comments and suggestions for further class structure and activities. No multiple drafts required
The in-class writing activity allows each student to spend 3 weeks on one essay. It is suggested, however, that students revise and write further drafts and submit them after they receive feedback from the instructor and/or peers thereafter. Hard copies are required for all primary drafts, while final drafts may be submitted electronically. Students are also required to make multiple hard copies for their classmates for peer review. During the last week of class, each student will submit his/her portfolio—a collection of written works he/she has completed during the semester, which includes both first and final drafts of: their on-line journals, in-class essays, and the reflection paper. There is no midterm or final examination. Evaluation is divided into:
Attendance and participation | 30% |
On-line journal entries and essay submission and revision | 30% |
Translation research summary and critique | 10% |
Portfolio | 30% |
Total | 100% |
Suggested
APA style essentials. (n.d.). Retrieved October 27, 2007, from http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/ddegelman/index.aspx?doc_id=796
Carnicelli, T. A. (1980). The writing conference: A one-to-one conversation. In T. R. Donovan & B. W. McClelland (Eds.). Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 101-131).
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.).
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power.
Elbow, P. (2000). Everyone can write.
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-37, Reprinted in
Hayakawa, S. I. & Hayakawa, A. R. (1990). Language in thought and action.
Horton, S. R. (1982). Thinking through writing.
Huff, R. & Kline, C. R., Jr. (1987). The contemporary writing curriculum.
Leki,
Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.). Richness in writing.
Paraphrasing. (n.d.). Retrieved June 16, 2007, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/619/01/
Perl, S. (1980). Understanding composing. Reprinted in
Rose, M. (1980). Rigid rules, inflexible plans, and the stifling of language: A cognitivist analysis of writer’s block. Reprinted in
Spatt, B. (1991). Writing from sources (3rd edition).
Williams, J. M. (1990). Style.
Zinsser, W. (2006). On writing well (7th, edition).
Course Outline
1 Jun 3 | - Course orientation (Course and student goals) - Writing as a vehicle for thoughts; multiple-draft writing - Types of writing ICW: Essay 1.1 | HW: Start looking for a TR paper; find texts to write about; write your journal on the blog. |
2 Jun 10 | Generating ideas: Pre-writing activities I ICW: Essay 1.2 | AD: Essay 1.1 HW: Bring to class a text you are interested in.
|
3 Jun 17 | - - Peer review for main and supporting ideas ICW: Essay 1.3 | AD: Essay 1.2 |
4 Jun 24 | Generating ideas: Pre-writing activities II ICW: Essay 2.1 | AD: Essay 1.3 |
5 Jul 1 | Writing from reading I: Summary writing ICW: Essay 2.2 RM: You should have a TR paper with you by now. | AD: Essay 2.1 |
6 Jul ___ | Writing from reading II: Paraphrasing ICW: Essay 2.3 | AD: Essay 2.2 HW: Bring to class an academic paper (article from a journal).
|
7 Jul 15 | Respecting sources and the reader: Citation ICW: Essay | AD: Essay 2.3 |
8 Jul 22 | - Writing for an audience I: The tip-of-the-iceberg phenomenon and the writer’s two selves - Peer review: Finding the tips of the iceberg ICW: Essay 3.2 | AD: Essay 3.1 |
Jul 27-Aug 2 | No class (Midterm week) RM: If you have not done so, start reading your TR paper now. | |
9 Aug 5 | Writing for an audience II: Anticipating the reader’s questions ICW: Essay 3.3 | AD: Essay 3.2 |
10 Aug ___ | - Making use of grammar - Peer review for grammar work ICW: Essay 4.1 | AD: Essay 3.3 |
11 Aug 19 | Making use of vocabulary ICW: Essay 4.2 | AD: Essay 4.1 |
12 Aug 26 | Style and organization ICW: Essay 4.3 | AD: Essay 4.2 |
13 Sept 2 | Cohesion ICW: Essay 5.1 Summary and critique of TR | AD: Essay 4.3 |
14 Sept 9 | - Coherence - Peer review for coherence ICW: Essay 5.2 | AD: Essay 5.1 |
15 Sept 16 | Review Conclusion to course | AD: Essay 5.2 |
Sept 23 | No class (Final week) | AD: Portfolio |
No comments:
Post a Comment